5.7x28mm Versus 22 Magnum- (FiveSeven 5' Pistol Versus 24' Rifle) Five-seven




What do you think about this video?

captainvirgilHilts: I assume you mean my statement about SS12/195 behaving like a FMJ. Yes it acts entirely like an FMJ as is does not fragment or expand, the nib HP is a matter of semantics to fit in where HP is required. The most it does is sometimes spit the core. As for being 'far thinner'... Grip width is the same, the PMR beats the FN by 0.1" at the controls versus FN's max width at the nubs on the rear of the slide (using FN and KT specs). A tenth of an inch is no where near 'far thinner'

captainvirgilHilts: Ah the desperate ramblings of someone trying to save face. You state that I am getting all defensive yet you are the one cranking out multiple repeat posts, resorting to claims of lies, emotional critique, etc, LOL But to address -YES it's a particular round you want DUH -If you can't afford one to bad for you -ammo is typically less than mid/top shelf 9mm -Cite how 5.7x28mm is "dangerously high pressured" :-)

captainvirgilHilts: By all means... after you. Your the one citing all these facts and having all sorts of issues, how about you address just half of your false/incorrect statements. I keep having to correct all your bad info to which you you become a shrinking-violet then ignore it or change your heading. I'm still waiting for you to cite your 'detuned' performance figures, your bullet weights & materials that do not exist, or CCI's guarantee among a bunch of other of your claims. Oh wait, nitpicking :-P

Eric Lopez: @MafiaGENGTEAM1970 You must be a COD Fanboy with that kind of a response.

captainvirgilHilts: "And honestly... do you think nitpicking at things like whether it's aluminum or tin cored, or 28 grain vs. 29.5" -It's not nitpicking it just shows your lack of facts and consistency "makes you seem intelligent when you keep dodging" -I have addressed all your points and then some "you're trying to compare the V-max's power mainly to the WMR" -All three were shown, your the one who keeps ignoring the 195

DishonorableSlap: @elitesack more like 15.00 dollars for 50

sparklerbombg: can a 22 also fire a .17?

twistedcross: Did you even watch the video? .22 mag ineffective vs clothed targets? How many people do you know that wear clothing 3 phone books thick?

tlwolff: About the least informative video I've seen on here. Loose the music and explain what is happening.

Idontplaymmos: @GunnyStilgar

smartguy104: @captainvirgilHilts The 5.7 gets over 2000 fps in pistols so no matter weather its a 22wmr rifle or pistol it still is considerably stronger. Brass fetcher web shows three different 5.7FN loads as yielding superior ballistics gel performance to a 230 grain 45acp federal loaded Hydra shocks.

jrmyscttwds: i couldnt find the mute button fast enough

captainvirgilHilts: Well then feel free to do so.

gacountryboy389: @markdam Yeah but do you really wanna spend 1,000 on a FiveseveN when you can spend less and get a sig sauer 1911 or something like that?

IcabodCrane: Will this not let me link? Because if not I don't see how you expect me to cite the proof of just how sad the damage is from the M80 .308 nato is compared to even a .357 unless you're thick enough to be packing a chest depth of over 10".

captainvirgilHilts: Out of like barrels -28/40gr 5.7 delivers 275/256 ft-lbs -30/40gr WMR delivers 149/138 ft-lbs -Simple ballistics shows that respective HP projectiles will favor 5.7 in fragmentation. -Simple ballistics shows that respective FMJ projectiles will favor 5.7 in penetration. -This is not opinion but fact -I have no issues with WMR as it will do the job well, 5.7 just does it better

captainvirgilHilts: There are no flaws as is and I was already being GENEROUS by comparing the two using rifle versus pistol. Most people that compare the two do so using WMR rifle ballistics versus 5.7 pistol ballistics. I didn't have any at the time but all that using a hi-vel 30gr WMR would show is similar damage/fragmentation but with FAR less penetration. All one has to do is look at the numerous gel tests posted on line to confirm.

IcabodCrane: I find it rather sad how defensive you've gotten when I've just tried to make a simple, non-aggressive discussion/argument over the two handguns. I mean with some of the points you've laid out, I could also add in that the 5.7mm is known as a cop killer, and was used against your own men in the recent Houston killings, Captain.

captainvirgilHilts: Nor can you get a PMR30... so what?

IcabodCrane: Oh and Captain... how is a pistol round that hits 50,000 PSI pressures not considerably more dangerous than the measly 18,000 a 45 fires? I mean I'd be afraid that plastic gun of yours would explode in my hand. CZ52's are notorious for exploding from using slightly higher pressure rounds than stock, and I've seen plenty of glocks explode from hot .40 ammo, which is running maybe 40k?

captainvirgilHilts: Thats the point, morons love to say that 5.7x28 is nothing but expensive 22WMR yet 5.7 out of the pistol outperforms 22WMR fired from a rifle. Pretty simple concept.

captainvirgilHilts: 7.62 NATO is "horrendously inferior" to a 44 magnum HP. -picks jaw off floor -starts uncontrollably laughing -snorts morning coffee out of nose onto keyboard -almost wets pants -regains composure long enough to type........ You sir are a hoot!

f3nixfire: Lets just say I wouldnt want to get shot with a five seven.......it can drop someone in a hurry. Outstanding home defense weapon.

Gene Plum: 3 rounds and some wet phone book is hardly a test......FAIL .

captainvirgilHilts: BTW it was rather obvious that your mention 'after the fact' was simply you back pedaling after posting all your incorrect figures. I'm also curious as to why you fail to address the fact that I keep busting you on all your incorrectly stated figures. You ramble on post after post whining that you don't approve of my basic comparison all the while you can't even get your info correct. You bitch about showing and not citing... okay, back up your claims. After all your the one making them :-)

dayh8: I'd love to hear what you have to say and not listen to the awful music. Thanks for the pictures though.

captainvirgilHilts: Incorrect FN has produced 3 types of 28gr load, 192, 195, 198. The first two produced 2100fps out of the pistol, neither are still in production but can still be found retail. SS198 is being currently produced and delivers about 2250fps out of the pistol, it is restricted sale per FN. Projectile construction is identical for all three.

captainvirgilHilts: Who said I was a Captain? Oh wait your just making ASSumptions based on my id as well as just generally talking out your ass and making stuff up AGAIN. You see Mr Genius, Captain Virgil Hilts is simply a well known character played by Steve McQueen in The Great Escape. A pure genius you are sir LOL

parabellumantonio: The point is: you have a most powerful gun with a smaller size. The 5.7x28 is better ammunition that .22 Magnum.

Reapers261: It looks like the SS195 would make a better Personal Defense Round, but all i can find in stores is the SS197SR. Where can i find SS195? Would it be better for defense??

cakley01: Amazing results from the Pistol against the .22mag rifle. And that is with standard 5.7 ammo. EA ammo would have been even more impressive.

IcabodCrane: It isn't a particular round, it's V-max verses V-max. Again something you should be able to comprehend. Is it so hard to show? Or are you lying about your overpriced toy with it's overpriced, dangerously high pressured rounds?

GoWxL3GACYxGaming: basically im just saying the 5.7 gets deeper penetration i i just wrote it a little differently than i thaught it

captainvirgilHilts: (Such spastic postings that you can't even quote so that folks can follow what you are trying to go on about) I thought you were buds with FN reps? If so you should be able to talk to them over some hot coco where they would inform you that SS192/198 were never designed to expand/fragment. Per their own design history the design is to alter CG to create 90 deg yaw as well as alter aerodynamics. Not a failure but per design. SS197 otoh was designed to fragment.

GoWxL3GACYxGaming: its only natural the 5.7 did better because the density of the material used to make them is more than the 22mag which makes them a little less brittle and they are designed to take on targets with clothing on 22 mag made for soft targets

captainvirgilHilts: "I tried to link you a few of the cites..." -Unable and unwilling to stand behind your many false statements as usual. (btw ding-dong you don't have to link a URL you could just cite the website or source) "it's been proven you're a censoring coward" -But yet your still here rambling, interesting. "you're a fat piece of nothing" -Yet it obviously bugs you so much that you can't seem to come up with anything factual to debate with. Nice... LOL :-)

IcabodCrane: I'd just like to see a video which shows the difference between the two V-maxes. One thing I do think is relevant though is a 6" penetration can be good in a situation where you might have a lot of bystanders, f'rinstance in an urban area. People are legally liable for overpenetration shots wounding innocent bystanders, which is the main reason I love the .22 magnum, because even with the lack of frag out of smaller barrel, chances are it won't make it through the back of their ribs.

chattmanjiii: best test of fn 5.7mm vs. 22 mag. I have ever seen ,it shows all characteristics of both rounds. ! Thanks!

IcabodCrane: I am personally ashamed that the US would allow such a sleazy piece of work as yourself make it all the way to Captain, I wouldn't doubt two months from now you create another Houston disaster when enough people point out how ridiculous your ballistics "proof" is, and just continue to troll you for being such a loser. I don't know why I'm even still posting aside from sheer boredom, perhaps to see if you finally blow the last screw in your defective brain.

janius777: @captainvirgilHilts 5.7 is like a .22 "super" magnum concerning shell capacity but you didn´t mention what ammunition you were using - hollows? shooting telephone books isn´t comparable to real life issues I guess - according to manufactorer civilian 5.7 bullet is designed with aluminium tip or hollow point to frag easily especially on hard targets like steel - don´t think there would be much difference on these type of targets

captainvirgilHilts: -How on earth do you come up with 'far sleeker' as dimensionally they are nearly identical? -PMR operation is not an either/or, it's a hybrid system like the FN's recoil/delayed-blowback hybrid. -Never said any organs were. -Never said they did. -No guarantees here, just fact as follows -28/40gr 5.7 delivers 275/256 ft-lbs -30/40gr wmr delivers 149/138 ft-lbs (both out of like barrels) -FN does not make any loads with a 'tin-core' all are lead or aluminum (some with steel pen or poly tip)

Jesus Saves: I agree with you on the 5.7 round but the only pistol available to my knowledge is the fn which seems like an air soft gun that is way over priced. Hopefully some day the gun makers will expand and manufacture guns in this round. As a side note some gun stores will only sell the 5.7 gun as well as the ammo to people with proof that they work in law enforcement. Good review.

Aaron Thiel: I notice you only test one type of WMR ammo (Federal WMR isn't that great I was suprised it did so well) I would test a couple others that are designed to expand. Hornady, 30 Grain, V-MAX CCI Maxi-Mag Both of these will preform much better than the Fedral.

Bryan Reavis: Good vid, bad music, great idea. Thanks for sharing.

captainvirgilHilts: Oh and BTW, no one has or has had to 'prove' anything because I have clearly stated more than once that posts with excessively vulgar language and/or that stray from topic will be deleted. And those who continue to do so will get the boot. If you don't like like it either: a) post like at least a halfway mature adult b) post someplace else

jsd5179: 4 mins of pointing and flipping pages .... wow best review ever

captainvirgilHilts: And once again in your frustration you have not actually quoted anything so we have no idea what you are addressing. See if you look over here -------------------------------> you will see a reply button, when you see something you would like to comment on click it. That way we all will know what the heck you are yapping about. As for knowing anything... cite where I stated "FMJ equates to V-max". I will be waiting ;-)

IcabodCrane: I mean have you ever looked up the ballistic differences between a hollow point and an FMJ? Even out of a 7.62 NATO round, the damage done is horrendously inferior compared to even a .44 magnum hollow point, whereas a .308 hunting round with a soft point will leave a massive hydraulic wound channel.

EliteAmericans: @captainvirgilHilts depends what kind of pistols. Those little dinky NAA revolvers have tiny barrels and they hit about as hard as a 22lr from a rifle would hit. A good revolver like a rough rider or a single six with a long 6+ inch barrel can easily generate over 250 foot pounds with the right bullets.

captainvirgilHilts: "I think he's afraid of proving his pistol's not much more than an overpriced .22 mag" -Oh by all means please prove it to us. Show us how two similar weight projectiles can perform ~equal when one delivers nearly 2x the energy at about 30% more velocity. "he even tried to make the rebuttal that the hp rounds made for FN don't tend to mushroom properly" -Ah lying again I see. SS192/195 were not designed to expand/fragment as stated by FN. "Honesty & accuracy Pfft" -IcabodCrane

Rating:
5.7x28mm versus 22 Magnum- (FiveSeven 5" pistol versus 24" rifle) Five-seven 3.1 out of 5

Shared by Others

5.7x28mm versus 22 Magnum- (FiveSeven 5
5.7x28mm versus 22 Magnum- (FiveSeven 5" pistol versus 24" rifle) Five-seven
Hornady Critical Defense .22 Magnum (WMR) 45gr FTX (83200). VS Pork Shoulder
Hornady Critical Defense .22 Magnum (WMR) 45gr FTX (83200). VS Pork Shoulder
FN Five-seveN  5.7X28mm
FN Five-seveN 5.7X28mm
FN Five seveN Pistol vs Grendel P30
FN Five seveN Pistol vs Grendel P30
FN Five-Seven 5.7x28mm Pistol Shoot-A-Matic
FN Five-Seven 5.7x28mm Pistol Shoot-A-Matic
Pistol Ammo Review
Pistol Ammo Review
Masterpiece Arms 5.7x28mm Pistol
Masterpiece Arms 5.7x28mm Pistol
Red Jacket Firearms Vigilant .22 user servicable suppressor
Red Jacket Firearms Vigilant .22 user servicable suppressor
5.7x28mm from FN FiveSeven versus 9mm Five-seven
5.7x28mm from FN FiveSeven versus 9mm Five-seven
FN Five-Seven 5.7x28mm Pistol
FN Five-Seven 5.7x28mm Pistol
5.7x28mm Performance Against Soft Body Armor
5.7x28mm Performance Against Soft Body Armor
5.7x28mm SS197SR VS. Level II Body Armor. FiveSeveN
5.7x28mm SS197SR VS. Level II Body Armor. FiveSeveN
Elite Ammunition S4 UltraRapTOR (5.7x28mm) vs a 10lb Pork Shoulder
Elite Ammunition S4 UltraRapTOR (5.7x28mm) vs a 10lb Pork Shoulder
5.7x28mm from FN FiveSeven versus 9mm (2nd test) Five-seven
5.7x28mm from FN FiveSeven versus 9mm (2nd test) Five-seven
Great Rifle Ammunition Comparison. 90 calibers from .22 flobert to 20 mm Vulcan and 25x137 & 30x173
Great Rifle Ammunition Comparison. 90 calibers from .22 flobert to 20 mm Vulcan and 25x137 & 30x173
SLOW MOTION 5.7x28mm FN SS-197 impacting ballistic gelatin
SLOW MOTION 5.7x28mm FN SS-197 impacting ballistic gelatin
5.7x28 and .22WMR Ballistic Testing FN Five-seveN and Kel-Tec PMR-30
5.7x28 and .22WMR Ballistic Testing FN Five-seveN and Kel-Tec PMR-30
Shooting Grendel P30 & FN Five seveN
Shooting Grendel P30 & FN Five seveN

Featured Video