VaporTrailMix: 3:40 I beg to differ 10 FPS makes a HUGE difference if you're comparing a
game running at 20FPS to one at 30 FPS. Once you go over 60FPS you're eye
can't tell the difference. A game running at 60FPS will appear the same as
one at 160FPS.
VocaloidRulztheWorld: do you have a vid of them not over clocked and yea i've always heard intel
better data output but amd better rendering speeds also there is actualy a
12 core amd but it's for servers
SandersCSclips: thank you, sum1 stands up for AMD. the AMD chips are not bad at all...
like seriously there are so many haters its not even funny ( or should say
intel fanboys ) the last intel rig i had my sister has now and runs great (
core2duo e8600 oc'd hard lol ) but since then i got the phenom II x 4 965
and i love it. and now i got the 8350 for 150+ free shipping ( no heatsink
cause i have an aio for it ).. and its amazing. yes intel owns in alot of
benchmarks but in realistic real world experiences. your not gonna see a
sorry for my rant lol
good video :D
Bungie Brony: Ok im very supportive of amd but at 2:50 the amd GPU has a much better
clock than the intels GPU
VocaloidRulztheWorld: for me honestly eather way amd is way more linux friendly has had years of
great support and nvidia just now ish has a legitimate release now rather
than just a adaption version main point amd is better for vm's but sorta
shaky on who's better for rendering faster of video's but mostly atm for
which i wana get i don't know i got a i 5 laying around can't use it
because this pc is incredibly old i think it came out around when Pentium d
came out so obviously can't install cpu till i scrap some money together
but if i could find out what newer cpu chip is better over all and
differences on gen as well that'd be great i'd assume higher gen runs
cooler and faster
GIKONTdoo Beograd: LOL for video...it seems they are like equal to eachother...how about to
comapre i7 4970k with that AMD who wins there what you think....you
comparing the strongest AMD cpu with Intel average CPU all in matters in
price perfomance ratio...Dude who have money he seek for perfomance he does
not care about AMD crapp Intel is better because of tehnology thats vhy it
cost much more, thats how was alway been!!!
Avast Samble: AMD is the gpu god, and kills in cpu for performance per dollar , i5 and
this processor are much better than the i7 , i mean who pass 200 more for
less than 20% performance increase hahaha
inteltards i guess
brandon christian: its 4 cores against 8 anyway and a lot of games only support 4 cores....
sshers1: AMD is for gaming and intel is for office work.
Get you're fact straight.
lyingscum: What I meant to say was my Fx 6100 barely managed to run 2 monitors at
1920x1080! with all settings maxed!
Ace1000ks1975: AMD chips have more wear and tear due to overheating. Intel chips last a
long time, and that means something for office computers.
mfgunit: At 3min mark you can clearly see that HD7950 on intel machine is extremely
UNDERCLOCKED compared to amd machine. wtf???
nicestmanintheworld: Way is your motherboard you used n the video?
ashtwoface: I still don't really get what is better..my budget is any price below 1000
Canadian dollars and Im not at all looking for I7 since I figure they must
all be over 1000 for sure I am looking for some gaming but also running
software like 3DsMax and stuff but yeah I saw a few charts for comparing
the amd and intel and the 2 charts were totally opposite each other and
here the answer for sorta diplomatic so please lemme know asap what is a
good i5 laptop with amd/intel dedicated graphics for gaming
Cyricc: My personal score from my system: w w w 3dmark com / 3dm11 / 4671315
Physics Score 8752 Another score from someone else's "much better" system
with a8350 and 7870: w w w 3dmark com / 3dm11 / 5550584 Physics Score 6815
What's high score mean? Did I break it?
Baron Nasher: What kind of question is that??
Omnimity: In imaging i5 is faster, other applications of Adobe FX is. The link works
fine if you replace "dot" with ".", I have others that back it up also.
GreenZ Clan: Okey, thank you very much! :)
Omnimity: ROFL what an idiot. Not even close to the first games. BF3 has been out for
2 years and it uses 8, there are games older than it that use 8. Yes they
are rare but they exist. Um no another "fact" pulled out of your ass. It is
well known that Intel is the more powerful overclocker. Intel runs faster
clock for clock so getting the auto turbo boost that moves the chip up
0.5ghz will equal a full 1GHZ move on an AMD. AMD runs hot and inefficient
Jason H: Why do you keep deleting your comments? You realise you're talking crap? It
does make good use of them as evidenced by the performance gains it gets
using more than 4 and by the cpu usage which can be checked. What are these
games that make far better use of 8 cores? Why are you such a fanboy? I'm
stating verifiable facts while you just spout fanboy nonsense. 4 cores or
less the 3570k is better, they are balanced at around 6 cores and the 8350
is stronger in 8 thread programs.
NOMANSGUEST: Can any of you people read and look at the specs he had for each system?
look carefully again he gave the intel system not just more ram but a
little more of everything. dont believe me look again before talking intel
and amd "fanboys"
TheGingertator: yeah..................... well intel is a over priced but is a little
faster but is not worth it
Omnimity: My god you are freaking hard headed and in denial. i5 is faster in imaging
and Adobe Photoshop here is the proof (I don't pull facts from the same
place I crap unlike you) :
maddogfarg0: Oh and I almost forgot the best source...This video...you know...the one
you're currently commenting on. XD
beameron: That is because core per core the Intel is better. Since it uses the 22nm
architecture and the AMD uses 32nm. But since you never only use one core
its bullcrap. Much older games will run better on the I-5 but newer games
take advantage of more cores (BF3,Crysis3,Metro,etc) and run overall better
on the AMD cpu`s. And upcoming games will also benefit from more cores.
Looking at the overall CPU uses and how it works, the AMD still beats the
I-5 in most cases.
beameron: The I-5 uses 22nm architecture and the AMD uses 32nm the physics tests will
be a bit lower on the AMD side. But since you will never use only 1 or 2
cores those tests are bullcrap. The FX8350 is overall faster then the i-5
because it has more cores. But you have seen the video, So you can see it
for yourself :D And also most (newer games) Are so much smoother on the
FX8350 [Coming from the 3570K and now using the FX8350, AMD didnt let me
Omnimity: Do you understand how computers work? The percentage change is all that
matters, it doesn't matter if the game only uses 2 cores or whatever. The
Intel chip yields better results than overclocking the FX.
ulgk: Great video. You should include the measurement of gigaflops between the
two CPU. Awesome review, I just subscribe to your channel.
Omnimity: I know it doesn't, this is the same comment minus a typo. BF3 uses 8 idiot,
not 4 look it up. You are an idiot if you think Crysis 3 is the only game
out there that uses a lot of cores.
Zayah V: The amount of memory has nothing to do with a fair benchmark as long as you
have enough memory to run all the programs you need with virtual memory
disabled to avoid the massive performance hit that comes with paging and
that is still only for loading speeds etc.
GreenZ Clan: No, im not trying to troll you :) Its just very different here in Norway
from the USA or other countries for that matter. So these 2 ''builds'' that
i chose are on the same price. The only thing im stuck with right now if is
if there really is a BIG differnce between SSD and normal WD? Because here
its much cheaper to get an WD than SSD and If i choose WD i will be able to
spend more money on the CPU or GPU. Thanks in advance!
LiberatedMind1: The 3770k overclocks too Einstein, bringing the performance gap right back.
One odd game that you falsely believe is the first of its kind to properly
use 8 cores is not proof of anything.
carl-renat ventsel: No......
joe D: what graphics card were you using?
SHOCKERownerR: smart one dude! i think ill be getting the 8350 after all. i can get it for
exact same price as i5 3570k but amd seems like a better investment for the
future with 8 cores and hyper threading..
Lee Jeffs: I see you point , why would xbox need an 8 core cpu when it`s a games
machine. ony thing I can think of is price.
XKongsterX: yes the price is lower but that only till u start adding in all ur
overclocking stuff to get the 8 core at 4.8 ghz u need some really good
cooling because believe me they get really hot with no overclock and just
playing games so add in the 100$ for water cooling or the 30 to 40$ for
good air cooling so just think the 30 dollars more u turn the turbo boos on
and and there u go u get the exactly same performance without the hassle of
Salih Durmisi: And i'm not trying to sound like a ''fanboy'' That is just ridiculous and
LosColhones: Guys what im really in doubt is in wich mother board I should buy for my
new desktop pc. (GPU: MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr III \ CPU: ive decided to go
with the AMD FX-835) I dont have a that big of a budget but if someone
knows a good motherboard for a low price/perfomance please tell me. Thank
you in advance.
MrImChaz: You don't use any grammar that's weird.
Erich Glenewinkel: you forgot to hold in to account that the 8350 has 8 threads compared to
the i5 which only has 4, multi threaded applications will of course gain
more from the 8350 as per the program you used to compare CPU's, but when
it comes to games (which does not use hyperthreading and wont for the next
2-3 years) the 3570k dominates the 8350... now before someone corrects me
yes there are 1 or 2 developers that do add multi threaded support for
games but still the most games only use 4 threads today
beameron: On what ? Running what test/game with what graphics card ???
Jason H: Sigh, your link doesn't work and I know for a fact that the 8350
outperforms the i5's in adobe photoshop, premier pro and after effects. The
most widely used cpu intensive programs in the suite. If you google Adobe
CS 6 cpu benchmarks and go to the first result you will see a comprehensive
list of all programs in the suite and a huge list of processors tested.
beameron: Well if that is how it is. Id say get the I-5 3570K with the GTX660ti and a
SSD. The best thing i bought years ago was an SSD and i have been using
them even since. They might have less storage but its soooo much more
reliable and faster then a HDD :3
Jason H: Yes as a matter of fact I do. I have a degree in Software development and I
am an indie games developer. I have also been working with pc hardware for
over 15 years. Of course it matters. I've explained it in plain english.
The i5 has 20% better per core performance therefore it performs 20% better
in a 2 threaded game. Make it 8 threads and the fx has the advantage. How
is that so hard for you to understand?
4run55: amd is better then intel you sir have wasted your life with intel
Salih Durmisi: The i5 was only a BIT faster at single applications. Nothing worth
bothering about. But his i5 at 4.3 ghz got murdered when it came to multi
threaded applications by my fx 8350 at stock, which most modern games
really do utilize. But still not fully. I am no fanboy of either one. I
just love whatever processor performs the best for the price. The i5 2500k
is great still and will be for a pretty nice time ahead.
Jason H: It would help if you knew were talking about before calling people idiots.
the reason the intels do better in games like Starcraft 2 and Shogun or
Skyrim is because all 3 games only use 2 cpu cores. The i5's have
significantly better per core performance than the 8320/50 so they do
better in these games. However, the 8320 and 8350 have 8 cores/threads. So
in programs and games that make use of all 8 they outperform the i5's.
That's why the 8350 outperforms the i5 in games like crysis 3.
MrSock59: get a better video card. that one is crap
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5 3570K CPU Benchmarks Test - PCWizKid4.7
out of 5