AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Core I5 3570K CPU Benchmarks Test - PCWizKid




What do you think about this video?

VocaloidRulztheWorld: do you have a vid of them not over clocked and yea i've always heard intel better data output but amd better rendering speeds also there is actualy a 12 core amd but it's for servers

VaporTrailMix: 3:40 I beg to differ 10 FPS makes a HUGE difference if you're comparing a game running at 20FPS to one at 30 FPS. Once you go over 60FPS you're eye can't tell the difference. A game running at 60FPS will appear the same as one at 160FPS.

SandersCSclips: thank you, sum1 stands up for AMD. the AMD chips are not bad at all... like seriously there are so many haters its not even funny ( or should say intel fanboys ) the last intel rig i had my sister has now and runs great ( core2duo e8600 oc'd hard lol ) but since then i got the phenom II x 4 965 and i love it. and now i got the 8350 for 150+ free shipping ( no heatsink cause i have an aio for it ).. and its amazing. yes intel owns in alot of benchmarks but in realistic real world experiences. your not gonna see a difference honestly. sorry for my rant lol good video :D

Bungie Brony: Ok im very supportive of amd but at 2:50 the amd GPU has a much better clock than the intels GPU

VocaloidRulztheWorld: for me honestly eather way amd is way more linux friendly has had years of great support and nvidia just now ish has a legitimate release now rather than just a adaption version main point amd is better for vm's but sorta shaky on who's better for rendering faster of video's but mostly atm for which i wana get i don't know i got a i 5 laying around can't use it because this pc is incredibly old i think it came out around when Pentium d came out so obviously can't install cpu till i scrap some money together but if i could find out what newer cpu chip is better over all and differences on gen as well that'd be great i'd assume higher gen runs cooler and faster

sshers1: AMD is for gaming and intel is for office work. Get you're fact straight.

Ace1000ks1975: AMD chips have more wear and tear due to overheating. Intel chips last a long time, and that means something for office computers. 

lyingscum: Iam looking at things strictly from a gaming perspective so currently iam shopping for an i5 3570k I work at Microcenter so I get a discount on either Cpu so ive chosen to go with the Intel this time around since I already have a Amd based rig with a Fx 6100- I wanna see for myself if there is any diffrence! If you run multiple monitors like Eyefinity ( Ive done this as well ) my Fx could barely keep-up with 2x 1080p hooked-up!

Avast Samble: AMD is the gpu god, and kills in cpu for performance per dollar , i5 and this processor are much better than the i7 , i mean who pass 200 more for less than 20% performance increase hahaha inteltards i guess 

brandon christian: its 4 cores against 8 anyway and a lot of games only support 4 cores....

GIKONTdoo Beograd: LOL for video...it seems they are like equal to eachother...how about to comapre i7 4970k with that AMD who wins there what you think....you comparing the strongest AMD cpu with Intel average CPU all in matters in price perfomance ratio...Dude who have money he seek for perfomance he does not care about AMD crapp Intel is better because of tehnology thats vhy it cost much more, thats how was alway been!!!

Jill Daen: if your budget gamer go for amd if you like more advance tech go for intel :) intel over clock 77w vs 167 w per hour hmmm

lyingscum: What I meant to say was my Fx 6100 barely managed to run 2 monitors at 1920x1080! with all settings maxed! 

KEITH KUHN: KEEP US POSTED ON WINDOWS 8.1 - YOUR THOUGHTS KK

mfgunit: At 3min mark you can clearly see that HD7950 on intel machine is extremely UNDERCLOCKED compared to amd machine. wtf???

nicestmanintheworld: Way is your motherboard you used n the video?

neromana2: If you want a cheap pc with good performance in games go AMD and if you want a super pc for games but expensive go INTEL NVIDIA

minecraftguide89: Why are you comparing a oc cpu vs a stock...

minecraftguide89: Why are you comparing a oc cpu vs a stock...

ashtwoface: I still don't really get what is better..my budget is any price below 1000 Canadian dollars and Im not at all looking for I7 since I figure they must all be over 1000 for sure I am looking for some gaming but also running software like 3DsMax and stuff but yeah I saw a few charts for comparing the amd and intel and the 2 charts were totally opposite each other and here the answer for sorta diplomatic so please lemme know asap what is a good i5 laptop with amd/intel dedicated graphics for gaming

Cyricc: My personal score from my system: w w w 3dmark com / 3dm11 / 4671315 Physics Score 8752 Another score from someone else's "much better" system with a8350 and 7870: w w w 3dmark com / 3dm11 / 5550584 Physics Score 6815 What's high score mean? Did I break it?

Baron Nasher: What kind of question is that??

Omnimity: In imaging i5 is faster, other applications of Adobe FX is. The link works fine if you replace "dot" with ".", I have others that back it up also.

GreenZ Clan: Okey, thank you very much! :)

Omnimity: ROFL what an idiot. Not even close to the first games. BF3 has been out for 2 years and it uses 8, there are games older than it that use 8. Yes they are rare but they exist. Um no another "fact" pulled out of your ass. It is well known that Intel is the more powerful overclocker. Intel runs faster clock for clock so getting the auto turbo boost that moves the chip up 0.5ghz will equal a full 1GHZ move on an AMD. AMD runs hot and inefficient when overclocked.

Jason H: Why do you keep deleting your comments? You realise you're talking crap? It does make good use of them as evidenced by the performance gains it gets using more than 4 and by the cpu usage which can be checked. What are these games that make far better use of 8 cores? Why are you such a fanboy? I'm stating verifiable facts while you just spout fanboy nonsense. 4 cores or less the 3570k is better, they are balanced at around 6 cores and the 8350 is stronger in 8 thread programs.

NOMANSGUEST: Can any of you people read and look at the specs he had for each system? look carefully again he gave the intel system not just more ram but a little more of everything. dont believe me look again before talking intel and amd "fanboys"

TheGingertator: yeah..................... well intel is a over priced but is a little faster but is not worth it

Omnimity: My god you are freaking hard headed and in denial. i5 is faster in imaging and Adobe Photoshop here is the proof (I don't pull facts from the same place I crap unlike you) : xbitlabs(dot)com/articles/cpu/display/fx-8350-8320-6300-4300_7.html

maddogfarg0: Oh and I almost forgot the best source...This video...you know...the one you're currently commenting on. XD

beameron: That is because core per core the Intel is better. Since it uses the 22nm architecture and the AMD uses 32nm. But since you never only use one core its bullcrap. Much older games will run better on the I-5 but newer games take advantage of more cores (BF3,Crysis3,Metro,etc) and run overall better on the AMD cpu`s. And upcoming games will also benefit from more cores. Looking at the overall CPU uses and how it works, the AMD still beats the I-5 in most cases.

beameron: The I-5 uses 22nm architecture and the AMD uses 32nm the physics tests will be a bit lower on the AMD side. But since you will never use only 1 or 2 cores those tests are bullcrap. The FX8350 is overall faster then the i-5 because it has more cores. But you have seen the video, So you can see it for yourself :D And also most (newer games) Are so much smoother on the FX8350 [Coming from the 3570K and now using the FX8350, AMD didnt let me down]

Omnimity: Do you understand how computers work? The percentage change is all that matters, it doesn't matter if the game only uses 2 cores or whatever. The Intel chip yields better results than overclocking the FX.

ulgk: Great video. You should include the measurement of gigaflops between the two CPU. Awesome review, I just subscribe to your channel.

Omnimity: I know it doesn't, this is the same comment minus a typo. BF3 uses 8 idiot, not 4 look it up. You are an idiot if you think Crysis 3 is the only game out there that uses a lot of cores.

Zayah V: The amount of memory has nothing to do with a fair benchmark as long as you have enough memory to run all the programs you need with virtual memory disabled to avoid the massive performance hit that comes with paging and that is still only for loading speeds etc.

GreenZ Clan: No, im not trying to troll you :) Its just very different here in Norway from the USA or other countries for that matter. So these 2 ''builds'' that i chose are on the same price. The only thing im stuck with right now if is if there really is a BIG differnce between SSD and normal WD? Because here its much cheaper to get an WD than SSD and If i choose WD i will be able to spend more money on the CPU or GPU. Thanks in advance!

LiberatedMind1: The 3770k overclocks too Einstein, bringing the performance gap right back. One odd game that you falsely believe is the first of its kind to properly use 8 cores is not proof of anything.

carl-renat ventsel: No......

joe D: what graphics card were you using?

SHOCKERownerR: smart one dude! i think ill be getting the 8350 after all. i can get it for exact same price as i5 3570k but amd seems like a better investment for the future with 8 cores and hyper threading..

Lee Jeffs: I see you point , why would xbox need an 8 core cpu when it`s a games machine. ony thing I can think of is price.

XKongsterX: yes the price is lower but that only till u start adding in all ur overclocking stuff to get the 8 core at 4.8 ghz u need some really good cooling because believe me they get really hot with no overclock and just playing games so add in the 100$ for water cooling or the 30 to 40$ for good air cooling so just think the 30 dollars more u turn the turbo boos on and and there u go u get the exactly same performance without the hassle of overclocking.

Salih Durmisi: And i'm not trying to sound like a ''fanboy'' That is just ridiculous and childish.

LosColhones: Guys what im really in doubt is in wich mother board I should buy for my new desktop pc. (GPU: MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr III \ CPU: ive decided to go with the AMD FX-835) I dont have a that big of a budget but if someone knows a good motherboard for a low price/perfomance please tell me. Thank you in advance.

beameron: Yeep.

MrImChaz: You don't use any grammar that's weird.

Erich Glenewinkel: you forgot to hold in to account that the 8350 has 8 threads compared to the i5 which only has 4, multi threaded applications will of course gain more from the 8350 as per the program you used to compare CPU's, but when it comes to games (which does not use hyperthreading and wont for the next 2-3 years) the 3570k dominates the 8350... now before someone corrects me yes there are 1 or 2 developers that do add multi threaded support for games but still the most games only use 4 threads today

beameron: On what ? Running what test/game with what graphics card ???

Jason H: Sigh, your link doesn't work and I know for a fact that the 8350 outperforms the i5's in adobe photoshop, premier pro and after effects. The most widely used cpu intensive programs in the suite. If you google Adobe CS 6 cpu benchmarks and go to the first result you will see a comprehensive list of all programs in the suite and a huge list of processors tested.

Rating:
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5 3570K CPU Benchmarks Test - PCWizKid 4.7 out of 5

Shared by Others

Review: AMD FX-8320 Black Edition 8-Core CPU
Review: AMD FX-8320 Black Edition 8-Core CPU
AMD FX-9590 8 Core 5Ghz Turbo Enabled CPU Review
AMD FX-9590 8 Core 5Ghz Turbo Enabled CPU Review
AMD FX-6300 CPU Review
AMD FX-6300 CPU Review
AMD FX-8350 CPU Review
AMD FX-8350 CPU Review
AMD FX-4300 CPU Review
AMD FX-4300 CPU Review
AMD FX-8350 Vishera (Piledriver) 4.0GHz 8-core Processor Review + Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 Vishera (Piledriver) 4.0GHz 8-core Processor Review + Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 CPU Review
AMD FX-8320 CPU Review
AMD FX-9590 Vishera CPU Review
AMD FX-9590 Vishera CPU Review
AMD FX-8350 Overclocking 4.8Ghz Video Review - PCWizKid
AMD FX-8350 Overclocking 4.8Ghz Video Review - PCWizKid
AMD FX-9590 Piledriver 5 GHz Review [HD]
AMD FX-9590 Piledriver 5 GHz Review [HD]
AMD FX Bulldozer 8150 8 Core Review
AMD FX Bulldozer 8150 8 Core Review
AMD FX-4300 4.8GHz Overclock Review
AMD FX-4300 4.8GHz Overclock Review
AMD FX 9000 series processors hitting 5GHz!
AMD FX 9000 series processors hitting 5GHz!
AMD FX 6300 CPU 4.8Ghz! PC Build Review
AMD FX 6300 CPU 4.8Ghz! PC Build Review
AMD FX-4100 CPU Review
AMD FX-4100 CPU Review
AMD FX-9590 5GHz 8-Core CPU Pricing & Benchmarks!
AMD FX-9590 5GHz 8-Core CPU Pricing & Benchmarks!
AMD FX 6300 First Impressions & Overclock Tests
AMD FX 6300 First Impressions & Overclock Tests
AMD FX-6200 6-Core Processor Review
AMD FX-6200 6-Core Processor Review
AMD FX-8350 4.8GHz Overclock Review
AMD FX-8350 4.8GHz Overclock Review
AMD FX 8350 vs Intel 3570K vs 3770K vs 3820 - Gaming and XSplit Streaming Benchmarks
AMD FX 8350 vs Intel 3570K vs 3770K vs 3820 - Gaming and XSplit Streaming Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 / 9370 - My Two Cents!
AMD FX-9590 / 9370 - My Two Cents!
AMD Piledriver FX-8350 CPU Processor Performance Overview NCIX Tech Tips
AMD Piledriver FX-8350 CPU Processor Performance Overview NCIX Tech Tips
Unboxing and Review- AMD FX-8320 Vishera (also check out the temps)
Unboxing and Review- AMD FX-8320 Vishera (also check out the temps)
AMD FX-9590 4.7GHz Socket AM3+ Eight-Core Desktop Processor Overview - Newegg TV
AMD FX-9590 4.7GHz Socket AM3+ Eight-Core Desktop Processor Overview - Newegg TV
AMD FX-4170 vs AMD FX-4100 vs AMD Phenom II X4 955 CPU Comparison Review
AMD FX-4170 vs AMD FX-4100 vs AMD Phenom II X4 955 CPU Comparison Review

Featured Video