Li Ming Jin: which last longer? im using AMD Phenom II X6 1090T and its like crashing like no fukin business...... im switching to intel soon....
TheG6Predator: AMD Fanboy, thats funny when i own intel products myself? I have an intel i7 4770k overclocked to 4.2ghz, and im happy with my proccessor, but even i can see that AMD are amazing processors and honestly i would be just as happy with an AMD 8350 overclocked as i am with my i7. Please dont think im a fanboy just because i support a product that not many others dont. The reason i do is because the product is actually GOOD!
KingRyot: The price beats Intel anyday But I do prefer intel for its coolness.
Mirrowel: Amd fanboy.
8350 can beat only first i5 gen's.
Sebastian F.: intel fanboy...
TheG6Predator: Have you checked out Tek Syndicate, im guessing no as his results back up this guys aswell. AMD FX 8350 competes extremely well and beats the i5 in many cases, and can compete with the i7's as shown in 3 different videos from Tek Syndicate. People need to realise the AMD CPU can beat the Intel's.
walter dieser: You have a similar voice of John Carmack bro... ;-)
Platinummatthew: well, there are benifets for going with amd or intel
Seahawk.Customs.Pc: intel wins in almost every test hands down.LavcoPriceTech--LinusTechTips--Toms-hard-ware an many more tested both of these an every time intel wins by alot but 1 or 2 test say amd won by a hair.so your test dont ad up to every ones else who tested the ntel Core i5 3570K CPU vs AMD FX-8350. hands down intel 3570k blows the 8350 away.an gpu has nothing to do with cpu vs cpu.
t103Ninja: when you say certain words you sound kinda the dude from scareface... just saying lol
fingersonaboard: what graphics card were you using?
tundraotto: "nice" memory speeds on the AMD.....
RACCHIETTO: Nope. I have an amd 1090t which has 6 cores, by disabling 2 of them i got a 20-25% fps decrease in BF3, from 80-75 fps (6 cores) to 65-60 fps (4 cores), looking in the same exact spot (in an empty server just to make sure it was always the same scenario). How can you say something like that if you didn't test it yourself? This isn't disinformation, these are facts.
Carmelo Washburn: I like you. Thumbed up!
MCStreamTV: @ashtwoface Actually, A good i7 CPU will run you about 300-500 canadian dollars. i live i ncanada, and my first budget build consisted of an i5 3570k, 8 gigs of ram, and a gtx 650 GFX card. obviously there was a motherboard and stuff, but i forget what the rest was XD
ashtwoface: I still don't really get what is better..my budget is any price below 1000 Canadian dollars and Im not at all looking for I7 since I figure they must all be over 1000 for sure I am looking for some gaming but also running software like 3DsMax and stuff but yeah I saw a few charts for comparing the amd and intel and the 2 charts were totally opposite each other and here the answer for sorta diplomatic so please lemme know asap what is a good i5 laptop with amd/intel dedicated graphics for gaming
Андрей Кириленко: тебе надо ты и переводи :р
Сергей Краснояров: Russian plz
beameron: On what ? Running what test/game with what graphics card ???
beameron: I honestly have no idea since i have 0% experience with a phenom 2 X6 1065t. But i just looked at the first few sites i found for a comparison and its about a 40/50% increase that i see so far o_O Since the phenom scores an average of 5093 on bench markings and the FX8350 scores 9,112 Where as the I-7 3770K scores 9,590 @3.5ghz So far the FX8350 has been an insane CPU to me. Hope i helped you a bit with this lol.
Paddock rj: Man! Had you "move" from 3570k to FX? I have a phenom 2 x6 1065t, but now i have the chance to move to this FX or 3570K. I dont know whitch one! I use my pc for gaming and convert audio and video. Some reviews say that the diference between my phenom and FX8350 is not great. Do you think so? Sorry, my english is not very good. Do you think FX better than my old phenom? Thanks
kensol98: AMD FX-8350 8-Core Processor How many fps ?
ctcole77: Hey Libertardedmind1, did Alex JonesTown fire you?
I haven't seen you shilling 911 twoofer lies on youtube lately.
Have you heard about FAKE THERMITE?
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
beameron: The I-5 uses 22nm architecture and the AMD uses 32nm the physics tests will be a bit lower on the AMD side. But since you will never use only 1 or 2 cores those tests are bullcrap. The FX8350 is overall faster then the i-5 because it has more cores. But you have seen the video, So you can see it for yourself :D And also most (newer games) Are so much smoother on the FX8350 [Coming from the 3570K and now using the FX8350, AMD didnt let me down]
beameron: That is because core per core the Intel is better. Since it uses the 22nm architecture and the AMD uses 32nm. But since you never only use one core its bullcrap. Much older games will run better on the I-5 but newer games take advantage of more cores (BF3,Crysis3,Metro,etc) and run overall better on the AMD cpu`s. And upcoming games will also benefit from more cores. Looking at the overall CPU uses and how it works, the AMD still beats the I-5 in most cases.
Jason H: Why are you using an old benchmark like 3dmark11 instead of the firestrike physics test?
His processor is clocked lower than yours despite having a higher overclock potential.
You should be running the performance or extreme test.
Your results are in stark contrast to all the tests done on professional websites and there are many people scoring far higher with the 8350 on there.
Cyricc: That's why consoles get away with 24-30 frames. A person who does notice, is going to use that to their advantage. I play CSS/GO and having AT LEAST 60 fps is how you win the game and appear to be better and faster than others. It makes a huge difference for anything fast paced and requiring accuracy and precious. Not to mention loading of assets, if you join a game and you lag for the first 5-10 seconds because you CPU can't process the data, that makes a difference.
eurorootz: It's funny how people argue over a few frames per second when in real time playing you won't notice a damn thing. freakin fanboys.
Cyricc: My personal score from my system:
w w w 3dmark com / 3dm11 / 4671315
Physics Score 8752
Another score from someone else's "much better" system with a8350 and 7870:
w w w 3dmark com / 3dm11 / 5550584
Physics Score 6815
What's high score mean? Did I break it?
Omnimity: AMD is bad at scaling. i7 gets healthy performance gain over i5 in BF3 which debunks your "it doesn't use over 4 cores" theory. FX 8350 however, does not. If in the future FX chips get a strong performance boost I'll eat my words okay? But I'm 99.99% sure you'll be doing the eating and the performance gap will grow.
Omnimity: In imaging i5 is faster, other applications of Adobe FX is. The link works fine if you replace "dot" with ".", I have others that back it up also.
Jason H: Sigh, your link doesn't work and I know for a fact that the 8350 outperforms the i5's in adobe photoshop, premier pro and after effects. The most widely used cpu intensive programs in the suite. If you google Adobe CS 6 cpu benchmarks and go to the first result you will see a comprehensive list of all programs in the suite and a huge list of processors tested.
Jason H: There are many variables involved in how much cpu load there is. The grass/vegetation eats cpu cycles as does most cpu based physics calculations. This is where the extra cores comes in handy. How much load on each core is completely dependant on what is happening in the game. This is also why 8 thread intels or amds also do much better in games with phys-x that is run on the cpu instead of an Nvidia card. Next gen consoles will be using 6 cores for games as standard with 2 reserved for os
Omnimity: 1 gaming benchmark. Show me that the game uses all 8 cores efficiently.
Jason H: I'm not basing it on 1 benchmark. Go check any program that uses 8 cores properly like Adobe CS suite and you will see the fx wins by a country mile only falling slightly behind the 3770k. If you can provide a link showing 90%+ cpu usage on 8 cores in Lost Planet 2 I will give you a medal. It's easy to add more threads by assigning tasks to additional threads that would normally be queued on a different single core. Utilising the full power of all of these cores/threads is a different story
Omnimity: My god you are freaking hard headed and in denial. i5 is faster in imaging and Adobe Photoshop here is the proof (I don't pull facts from the same place I crap unlike you) :
Omnimity: Yeah no crap pal. The fact you think this doesn't apply to Crysis 3 because the FX chip won by a margin though is hilarious.
Jason H: It's not cherry picked. It's verifiable in any programs that use 8 cores. The 8350 will always beat the i5 in those programs. The i5 does not outperform the 8350 in any freaking program in the whole adobe cs suite. You are wrong. Saying audio encoding means nothing. What audio encoder? If the encoder uses 8 cores the fx wins. If it uses 4 the i5 wins. All of this information is easily verifiable but you would sooner refute it than check the facts.
Omnimity: Lol, if it doesn't help your cause then you just regurgitate that tired old crap. Why do you base your entire case on one lone benchmark? The game is optimized for more than 4. But beyond 8 it starts to really not scale well. Why is your precious FX assdriver chip not faster in that case?
LiberatedMind1: More cherry picked benchmarks, well here are some 8 threaded apps that Intel wins in : Audio encoding, Adobe Photoshop and Imaging in general. You're the pitiful idiot here cherry picking data for your cause. There are many other 8 threaded apps where an i5 will match or beat an FX chip because it has crapty architecture. Yes its an anomaly, you're so hellbent trying to prove Crysis 3 makes better use of 8 cores than other game which is pure bullcrap.
Jason H: Resorting to insults now. Well done. I know how programs work. You can add more core support but it may only use 10-20% of additional cores for small tasks. It's all about how the program/game is programmed and what work load is assigned to the threads. List some properly 8 threaded programs that perform better on the i5 that properly utilise 90%+ of 8 cores/threads. This is easily verifiable by running benchmarks while monitoring cpu usage.
Jason H: Except it doesn't use 12 cores at all. It's optimised for 4 cpu cores and like I've explained the intel of course performs better with 4 thread games. Why do you find that so hard to accept or understand?
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5 3570K CPU Benchmarks Test - PCWizKid4.7
out of 5